The most dangerous military campaign in the Indo-Pacific is not the one that begins with missile launches and amphibious landings. It is the one that has been underway for years — fought with fighter sorties, coast guard cutters, cyberattacks, and economic leverage, calibrated to remain perpetually below the threshold that would trigger a collective international response.

China's gray zone campaign against Taiwan is a textbook case of coercion without war — what strategists variously call "salami slicing," "hybrid warfare," or "political warfare." It is designed not to conquer Taiwan outright, but to exhaust its military, isolate it diplomatically, erode its will to resist, and normalize the conditions under which a future use of force would face minimal opposition. The data suggests it is working.

The Air Incursion Campaign: Exhaustion by Spreadsheet

Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense (MND) began publicly reporting PLA air activity near its Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in September 2020. The data since then tells a striking story of escalation.

In 2020 (from September), Taiwan recorded approximately 380 PLA aircraft sorties near or into its ADIZ. In 2021, that number rose to 969. In 2022, following US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taipei, the total exceeded 1,700. By 2023, the pace had stabilized at roughly 1,500-1,600 annual sorties — a "new normal" that would have been considered a crisis a decade earlier.

Through 2024 and into 2025, the pattern persisted with notable qualitative shifts: an increasing proportion of sorties involved fourth-generation fighters (J-16s and Su-30MKKs), long-range bombers (H-6K/N variants capable of carrying anti-ship cruise missiles), and — most significantly — aircraft crossing the Taiwan Strait median line, the unofficial boundary that both sides respected for decades.

The military logic is brutal in its simplicity. Each PLA sortie near Taiwan's ADIZ forces the Republic of China Air Force (ROCAF) to scramble interceptors. A single scramble of two F-16Vs costs Taiwan an estimated $300,000-500,000 in fuel, maintenance, and accelerated airframe wear. The ROCAF operates approximately 140 F-16Vs, 55 Mirage 2000-5s (aging), and 130 F-CK-1 Ching-kuos. China's People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and PLA Naval Aviation combined operate over 2,500 combat aircraft.

The math is unforgiving. Taiwan cannot sustain one-for-one scramble responses indefinitely without grinding down its fleet's readiness. The ROCAF reportedly shifted in 2023 toward a "selective response" posture — scrambling only for incursions that meet certain threat thresholds and relying on ground-based radar and surface-to-air missile tracking for lower-level provocations. This is a rational adaptation, but it concedes airspace presence — which is precisely Beijing's objective.

The Maritime Squeeze: Coast Guard as Vanguard

China's maritime gray zone operations follow a pattern refined in the South China Sea over the past decade. The instrument is not the PLA Navy — it is the China Coast Guard (CCG), the world's largest maritime law enforcement fleet, with over 150 large patrol vessels (1,000+ tonnes), supplemented by hundreds of maritime militia fishing vessels.

The CCG's operations around Taiwan have escalated in parallel with the air campaign. Since 2022, CCG vessels have conducted increasingly routine patrols near Taiwan's outlying islands — particularly Kinmen and Matsu, which lie just kilometers off the Chinese mainland. In February 2024, following the death of two Chinese fishermen whose boat capsized during a pursuit by Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration, Beijing launched "routine law enforcement patrols" in waters around Kinmen that Taiwan considers its own jurisdiction.

This was a significant escalation. For the first time, Chinese government vessels were conducting sustained, acknowledged patrols inside what Taiwan had treated as its restricted waters for decades. The pattern mirrors China's approach at Scarborough Shoal (seized from Philippine control in 2012) and in the waters around the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands: establish presence, normalize presence, then assert jurisdiction as fait accompli.

The coast guard approach is strategically elegant. Coast guard vessels are white-hulled, nominally civilian, and legally classified as law enforcement rather than military. Firing on a coast guard vessel carries fundamentally different escalatory implications than engaging a warship. This creates an asymmetry: Taiwan must either tolerate the encroachment or risk being seen as the party that "militarized" a law enforcement dispute. Neither option is good.

In 2025, the CCG expanded its operations to include what analysts describe as "presence patrols" in the Taiwan Strait's central corridor — areas previously patrolled exclusively by Taiwan's naval vessels. Combined with China's 2024 revision of its Coast Guard Law — which authorized CCG personnel to use force against foreign vessels "violating Chinese sovereignty" — the legal and operational framework for a progressive maritime encirclement is being assembled in plain sight.

The Cyber and Information Domain

Taiwan is one of the most cyber-targeted entities on Earth. In 2024, Taiwan's National Security Bureau reported that government networks faced an average of 2.4 million cyberattack attempts per day — the vast majority attributed to Chinese state-sponsored actors. While the bulk of these are automated scanning and low-level probes, the scale itself is strategically relevant: it forces Taiwan to maintain perpetual defensive posture across its entire digital infrastructure.

More consequential than volume are the targeted operations. In 2023, cybersecurity researchers documented Chinese APT groups (notably APT41 and a cluster tracked as "Flax Typhoon") conducting persistent access operations against Taiwanese telecommunications providers, semiconductor firms, and government agencies. The objective of these operations is not immediate disruption — it is pre-positioning: establishing footholds in critical infrastructure that could be activated during a future crisis to degrade communications, disrupt logistics, or sow confusion during the critical opening hours of a conflict.

The information warfare component operates on a different timeline. Chinese state-affiliated accounts and media outlets maintain a constant drumbeat of narratives designed to undermine confidence in Taiwan's institutions, amplify domestic political divisions, and promote the inevitability of unification. Taiwan's Investigation Bureau has documented networks of fake social media accounts — often operated from mainland China but routed through Southeast Asian proxies — that surge in activity around Taiwan's elections and during cross-strait tensions.

A 2024 study by the RAND Corporation estimated that China's information operations targeting Taiwan involve several thousand full-time personnel across military (Strategic Support Force, now the Information Support Force), intelligence (Ministry of State Security), and United Front Work Department channels. The budget is unknown but likely exceeds $1 billion annually when including cyber operations.

Economic Leverage: The Invisible Blockade

China is Taiwan's largest trading partner, accounting for approximately 21% of Taiwan's total exports (including Hong Kong, roughly 35%). This creates a structural dependency that Beijing has shown increasing willingness to weaponize.

In August 2022, following the Pelosi visit, China suspended imports of selected Taiwanese food products — citrus fruits, fish, and confectionery — citing "sanitary inspection" failures. In 2023, Beijing launched an anti-dumping investigation into Taiwanese polycarbonate exports. In 2024, China announced the partial suspension of preferential tariff treatment for Taiwanese goods under the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), affecting 134 product categories worth approximately $5 billion in annual trade.

Each measure is individually limited — carefully calibrated to impose costs without triggering the kind of economic rupture that would galvanize international support for Taiwan. Collectively, they constitute a slow-motion economic squeeze designed to remind Taiwanese businesses of their vulnerability and incentivize political pressure on Taipei to accommodate Beijing.

The ECFA suspension is particularly significant. Signed in 2010, the agreement reduced tariffs on hundreds of categories of goods traded between Taiwan and China. Its partial rollback signals that Beijing views economic integration not as a mutual benefit to be preserved, but as leverage to be modulated based on Taiwan's political behavior. For Taiwanese firms with supply chains deeply embedded in the mainland market — which includes significant portions of the electronics, petrochemical, and agricultural sectors — this creates persistent uncertainty that functions as a form of economic coercion even without further action.

The Diplomatic Attrition Campaign

In 2016, Taiwan had 22 diplomatic allies — nations that formally recognized the Republic of China. By early 2026, that number stands at 12, following the defection of Nauru in January 2024. Each switch follows a familiar pattern: Beijing offers infrastructure investment, development loans, and diplomatic prestige; the ally calculates that recognition of Beijing offers more tangible benefits than loyalty to Taipei.

The absolute number matters less than the trajectory. Each lost ally reduces Taiwan's formal representation in international organizations, narrows the diplomatic channels available during a crisis, and reinforces a narrative of isolation. More practically, Taiwan's remaining allies are concentrated in the Pacific Islands, Central America, and the Caribbean — regions where Chinese investment and influence are growing rapidly.

Parallel to bilateral poaching, China has systematically excluded Taiwan from international institutions. Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations, the World Health Organization (its observer status was suspended in 2016), the International Civil Aviation Organization, or Interpol. Each exclusion has practical consequences — Taiwan's absence from WHO was acutely felt during the COVID-19 pandemic — and symbolic ones, reinforcing Beijing's position that Taiwan is not a sovereign entity entitled to international participation.

The Strategic Logic: Boiling the Frog

Gray zone warfare works not through any single dramatic act, but through the cumulative effect of thousands of small ones. Each individual sortie, patrol, cyberattack, or trade restriction is, in isolation, below the threshold that would justify a military response from Taiwan or intervention by its partners. But the aggregate effect is substantial.

The strategic logic operates on multiple levels simultaneously:

This is not a new playbook. Russia employed similar gray zone tactics against Ukraine from 2014 to 2022 — cyberattacks, information warfare, economic pressure, and low-level military provocations — before transitioning to conventional invasion. China studied Russia's campaign closely. The difference is that China's version is more patient, more sophisticated, and backed by substantially greater economic and military resources.

The Cost to Taiwan: Quantifying the Invisible War

Estimating the total cost of gray zone warfare on Taiwan requires aggregating effects across multiple domains:

Military costs: Taiwan's defense budget for fiscal year 2025 was approximately NT$647 billion ($20.2 billion), representing 2.6% of GDP — a historic high. A significant and growing share is consumed by the operational tempo required to respond to gray zone provocations. The ROCAF has reported accelerated maintenance cycles and reduced training hours as a direct consequence of the scramble tempo. Taiwan's Air Force chief publicly stated in 2024 that the persistent ADIZ incursions were "the most serious challenge" to readiness, consuming resources that would otherwise fund training and modernization.

Economic costs: Beyond direct trade restrictions, the persistent threat environment imposes indirect costs through risk premiums. Insurance rates for shipping through the Taiwan Strait have increased incrementally since 2022. Foreign direct investment decisions — particularly in semiconductor manufacturing — increasingly factor in cross-strait risk. TSMC's decision to build advanced fabs in Arizona and Japan, while driven by multiple factors, is partly a hedge against Taiwan Strait instability that represents a long-term transfer of industrial capacity away from the island.

Psychological costs: These are the hardest to quantify and potentially the most important. Polling data from the Election Study Center at National Chengchi University shows that while Taiwanese identity has strengthened over the past decade, confidence in the willingness of the United States to intervene in a cross-strait conflict has fluctuated significantly — dropping notably after the fall of Kabul in 2021 and during periods of US domestic political turbulence. Gray zone operations are designed to amplify exactly this uncertainty.

Counterstrategies: What Works and What Doesn't

Countering gray zone warfare is inherently difficult because the strategy is specifically designed to exploit the gap between peace and war — the space where conventional deterrence offers no clear response.

Several approaches have shown promise:

Transparency and documentation. Taiwan's decision to publicly report PLA ADIZ incursions — posting daily data on the MND website — has been one of its most effective countermeasures. It transforms each Chinese sortie into a data point that accumulates into an undeniable pattern of coercion, visible to international audiences. The Philippines adopted a similar approach in the South China Sea, publishing video of Chinese coast guard water cannon attacks. Transparency does not stop the behavior, but it imposes reputational costs and builds the evidentiary basis for international response.

Selective response calibration. Taiwan's shift from scrambling interceptors for every incursion to a tiered response — using ground-based tracking for lower-threat sorties and reserving scrambles for genuine penetrations — is a rational adaptation that reduces the attrition cost. The key is ensuring that the selective posture does not create exploitable gaps in response.

Economic diversification. Taiwan's "New Southbound Policy," launched in 2016, aims to reduce economic dependence on China by deepening trade and investment ties with Southeast Asia, South Asia, and Australasia. Progress has been uneven — China's gravitational pull on regional trade is enormous — but the direction is correct. Reducing Beijing's economic leverage reduces the coercive surface area.

International coalition building. The most effective long-term counter to gray zone coercion is ensuring that the costs of escalation extend beyond the bilateral relationship. Japan's increasing willingness to identify Taiwan's security as linked to its own, the AUKUS partnership's focus on Western Pacific capability, and the European Union's growing engagement with Indo-Pacific security all contribute to a strategic environment in which Chinese escalation carries broader consequences.

The Danger of Habituation

The greatest risk of gray zone warfare is not any individual act. It is habituation — the gradual acceptance of each new baseline as normal. When daily PLA sorties near Taiwan's airspace cease to make headlines, when coast guard patrols inside previously uncontested waters become routine, when economic coercion is treated as ordinary trade policy — the gray zone strategy is succeeding.

History offers cautionary parallels. In the years before the 1982 Falklands War, Argentina conducted a series of gradually escalating sovereignty assertions over the islands — landing on South Georgia, increasing naval patrols, diplomatic provocations — that Britain largely ignored. By the time Argentina concluded that Britain would not fight, the invasion was a logical next step. The habituated party was surprised; the habituating party was not.

The Taiwan Strait in 2026 is not the Falklands in 1982. The stakes are incomparably higher, the military capabilities on both sides far greater, and the global economic consequences of conflict orders of magnitude more severe. But the psychological mechanism — the slow erosion of alarm, the normalization of the previously unacceptable — operates the same way regardless of scale.

Maintaining the capacity to distinguish between routine and rehearsal, between coercion and prelude, is not merely an intelligence challenge. It is a political and societal one. And it may be the single most important factor in determining whether the gray zone campaign remains gray — or transitions, as such campaigns sometimes do, into something far darker.

🎮 Simulate Escalation Scenarios

Explore how gray zone escalation leads to different conflict outcomes in our interactive Taiwan Strait simulator.

▶️ Launch the Simulator

Enjoyed this analysis? Help us keep the lights on and the simulations running.

☕ Buy Me a Coffee

Further Reading